Monday, February 17, 2014

Indisputable Evidence Showing That Cannabis Could Be The Most Nutritiona...











http://youtu.be/Pq0Awccfero





Published on 10 Aug 2012
Please sign the petition to test the nutritional value of the cannabis vegetable on humans.http://www.change.org/petitions/the-p...Cannabis Is The Most Important Vegetable On The Planethttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DE4pK0...Juicing Cannabis Marijuana for Health Benefitshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDJv9O...A1. Lawsuitshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Removal_...A2. Schedule 1http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/sch...A3. Official Positionhttp://www.justice.gov/dea/marijuana_...A4. Patenthttp://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Pa...A5. Study on Micehttp://www.ukcia.org/research/Antineo...A6. Endocannabinoid receptor discovered http://depts.washington.edu/stellalb/...A7. All bodily systems http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/c...A8. Vertebrates http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16...A9. Endocannabinoid discoveredhttp://www.sciencemag.org/content/258...A10. Mother's milkhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/artic...A11. 5 Endocannabinoidshttp://jpet.aspetjournals.org/content...http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/artic...A12. 85 Cannabis Cannabinoidshttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/artic...A13. Echinaceahttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17...A14. Marinolhttp://www.drugs.com/marinol.htmlA15. Cesamethttp://www.drugs.com/cesamet.htmlA16. Sativexhttp://www.gwpharm.com/GW%20and%20Bay...B1. Breast Cancerhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19...B2. Prostate Cancerhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15...B3. Lung Cancerhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21...B4. Pancreas Cancerhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21...B5. Liver Cancerhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21...B6. Cervical Cancerhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19...B7. Colon Cancerhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19...B8. Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18...B9. Leukimiahttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12...B10. Skin Cancerhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12...B11. Cirrhosishttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22...B12. Hepatitishttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18...B13. Alzheimer'shttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22...B14. Parkinson'shttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21...B15. Multiple Sclerosishttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22...B16. Arthritishttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16...B17. Cardiac Arrhythmiahttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12...B18. Insomniahttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14...B19. Sleep Apneahttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12...B20. Inflammatory Bowel Disease http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18...B21. Depressionhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20...B22. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19...B23. HIVhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21...B24. Osteoporosishttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21...B25. Nicotine Addictionhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18...C1. Non-Ingested Human Studies http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/vi...C2. Only Non-Smoked Human Study http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v95...C3. Acomplia FDA http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/06/sano...C4. Acomplia pulled http://www.acomplia.com/acl/cx/en/ind...D1. Rick Simpson http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0psJhQ...D2. Cash Hyde http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?sec...D3. Testimonials 1https://www.greenpassion.org/index.ph...D4. Testimonials 2http://phoenixtears.ca/testimonials/D5. David Tripletthttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tghUh...D6. Jack Hererhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWrqwZ...D7. Brett Strausshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ypbNY...D8. Dennis Hillhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ym0BSd...


Saturday, October 6, 2012

A 'sword in the side of prohibition' Maxwell Kusi Obodum• Published 30 Sep 2012 12:00 95 Comments Share this click to enlarge Life-changing: Multiple Sclerosis sufferer Clark French shows a note from a US doctor authorising the drug for his condition A HEALTH campaigner who uses cannabis to ease the crippling pains of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) found himself on a national stage this week when he starred in a mini-documentary aired on Channel 4. Clark French from Lower Earley claims his appearance on 4thought.tv on Tuesday night will prove a "springboard" in his campaign for the drug to be legalised in Britain for medicinal use. The 26-year-old from Sutcliffe Avenue, who triggered a fierce debate on the Chronicle's website last month when we exclusively revealed how his campaign was sparked by a three-month trip to California where the drug is available for medicinal use, said after the programme: "It's really exciting. I hope to use this to get my story out there and use it as a springboard for more media attention. My whole Facebook wall has exploded with comments and with people congratulating me. "It solidifies my belief that I have a valid argument and I plan to be a sword in the side of prohibition." During the five-minute programme the former Reading University student speaks passionately about how the drug has eased his two year battle with the degenerative disease which previously forced him to use a walking stick. He denies it is a "gateway drug" leading to harder substances and claims its illegal status leaves him at the mercy of "the drug dealers and gangs", While in California he obtained a prescription for oral capsules containing cannabis oil and after his return home uses a topical cannabis cream which he rubs on his limbs. He also smokes and eats the drug. He said: "It's an emotional and emotive subject for me. My whole quality of life has improved with it and I shouldn't be denied a medicine that works." *Clark also founded campaign group The Berkshire Cannabis Community which meets from 7.30pm on Monday, October 29, in Reading International Solidarity Centre (RISC) in London Street. See www.facebook.com/berkscc Join the debate on our Facebook page at www.facebook.com/readingchronicle

Friday, October 5, 2012

Top anti-drug researcher changes his mind – says legalize marijuana

Top anti-drug researcher changes his mind – says legalize marijuana (Source) 6.03.09 Over and over again, all the bad things we’ve been told about marijuana are revealed to be not only false, but often the precise opposite of the truth. So the next time someone tells you that marijuana is worse for your lungs than cigarettes, you might want to mention that the world’s leading expert on that subject happens to be a supporter of legalization. For 30 years, Donald Tashkin has studied the effects of marijuana on lung function. His work has been funded by the vehemently anti-marijuana National Institute on Drug Abuse, which has long sought to demonstrate that marijuana causes lung cancer. After 3 decades of anti-drug research, here’s what Tashkin has to say about marijuana laws: “Early on, when our research appeared as if there would be a negative impact on lung health, I was opposed to legalization because I thought it would lead to increased use and that would lead to increased health effects,” Tashkin says. “But at this point, I’d be in favor of legalization. I wouldn’t encourage anybody to smoke any substances. But I don’t think it should be stigmatized as an illegal substance. Tobacco smoking causes far more harm. And in terms of an intoxicant, alcohol causes far more harm.” [McClatchy] We’ve been told a thousand times that marijuana destroys your lungs, that it’s 5 times worse than cigarettes, and on and on. Yet here is Donald Tashkin, literally the top expert in the world when it comes to marijuana and lung health, telling us it’s time to legalize marijuana. His views are shaped not by ideology, but rather by the 30 years he spent studying the issue. He didn’t expect the science to come out in favor of marijuana, but that’s what happened and he’s willing to admit it. Here’s the study that really turned things around: UCLA’s Tashkin studied heavy marijuana smokers to determine whether the use led to increased risk of lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or COPD. He hypothesized that there would be a definitive link between cancer and marijuana smoking, but the results proved otherwise. “What we found instead was no association and even a suggestion of some protective effect,” says Tashkin, whose research was the largest case-control study ever conducted. Prejudice against marijuana and smoking in general runs so deep for many people that it just seems inconceivable that marijuana could actually reduce the risk of lung cancer. But that’s what the data shows and it not only demolishes a major tenet of popular anti-pot propaganda, but also points towards a potentially groundbreaking opportunity to develop cancer cures through marijuana research. Over and over again, all the bad things we’ve been told about marijuana are revealed to be not only false, but often the precise opposite of the truth. So the next time someone tells you that marijuana is worse for your lungs than cigarettes, you might want to mention that the world’s leading expert on that subject happens to be a supporter of legalization. ~ Tashkin is discussing the results of his pulmonary research involving marijuana for the first time: Even heavy, long-term marijuana smokers had no lung impairment after many years of smoking, and in fact tested slightly more healthy than those who didn’t smoke marijuana – “protective effect”. He does mention, however, that the protective effect may only be present in heavy smokers, as they are getting a higher amount of the cannabinoids. part 2: See Also: Marijuana Cuts Lung Cancer Tumor Growth In Half, Study Shows ~ Science Daily Pot Smoking Not Linked to Lung Cancer ~ WebMD Study Finds No Cancer-Marijuana Connection ~ Washington Post Time to legalize ~ Judge James Gray *recommended* Marijuana and your lungs ~ the latest findings Marijuana vs cigarettes About these ads FacebookTwitterMoreDiggEmailRedditStumbleUponPrintTumblrPinterest June 4, 2009 by 99% Categories: Study, Tashkin | 33 Comments Post navigation← FBI director gets schooled on marijuana legalizationLobbyists’ claims about medical marijuana don’t hold up →33 thoughts on “Top anti-drug researcher changes his mind – says legalize marijuana” Tom Haynie says: January 3, 2010 at 9:43 am http://tomhaynie.wordpress.com/about/its-just-a-dead-goldfish-tom/ Reply editors says: January 3, 2010 at 11:37 am Brilliant, thanks so much for sharing this article ~ Reply Tom Haynie says: January 11, 2010 at 12:50 pm Use it if you like…. Reply editors says: April 8, 2011 at 4:09 pm i’m going to reprint it here, thank you. Reply Lyn says: August 7, 2012 at 8:47 am This sparked a memory in my mind of a story our DARE officer told us in school. It was meant to scare us and make us laugh at the same time. He said a drug dealer was bagging up marijuana and didn’t have enough, so he ground up his goldfish that had jumped out of its bowl and dried up. I wonder if he realized just how ridiculous that sounded? I highly doubt a ground up goldfish would really look like pot, let alone the smell lol! I really enjoyed your piece. It’s an interesting and creative perspective. Just keep swimmin’! Reply Pingback: Top anti-drug researcher changes his mind – says legalize marijuana | Capital City Caregivers Walter Anthony Swierczynski says: December 2, 2010 at 4:23 pm 40 years ago I became anti government while serving my 2nd tour in Viet Nam. The #1 main reason was the unconstitutional prohibition of cannabis. I also believe it to be a Sacrement from God, and for these past 40 years I’ve been trying my darndest to wake people up to this miracle herb. Now in my twilight years, I get the sense that a good change is coming. Reply Dave says: December 2, 2010 at 8:11 pm Thanks for coming public with your opinions. Slowly but surely we are changing public opinion. A credible researcher such as yourself will help make that easier. Reply Anonymous says: February 20, 2012 at 10:19 am Thanks for your service Walt. As a stage 4 cancer survivor, I can attest to the healing and medicinal properties of this wonderful plant. The simpson oil saved my life, and gave me another chance at living. DJ, Michigan Reply Joe Gamble says: December 2, 2010 at 5:09 pm Disclosure is great! Disinformation and the Reagan administration is all over! Multiple Sclerosis made me aware of the history and benefits of hemp. Lets not forget to mention my best friends CBD,THC,CBN, and all the other 60+ cannabinoid cousins. Thank you for some bit of relief with this neuropathy phantom pain I have to manage. Reply Ken says: December 3, 2010 at 10:23 pm I am 42 years old Canadian and have been smoking marijuana for twenty five years. I have recently had to quit smoking do to my job, for reasons I find unfair.FEDERAL LAW, I have started to notice some of my injuries from years past have been bothering me, where they have never bothered me before I had to quit, don’t know what to do? signed: want to smoke. Reply Boccelli53 says: February 4, 2011 at 5:23 am I was a single parent,about to apply for a much needed job up-grade.Having worked since the age of 14, with nothing more than a GED,not mention being the sole support of three kids,this up-grade was sorely needed. After being a committed smoker(marijuana)for nearly 30yrs.I completely stopped.Within 6mos. my vision changed so drastically I couldn’t pass the eye examination. Heredity has passed three life altering illnesses to me that require much medication as treatment. I choose not to take narcotics, and marijuana makes my life livable.I’m not a criminal.I’ve raised three wonderful kids, and have three beautiful grand-kids.The benefits I get from marijuana are nothing compared to the benefits, world-wide, that there could be through legalization. Reply Jeanne DeFlorio says: August 7, 2012 at 7:53 am Thank you Boccelli53 for speaking out. People can and do live normal lives while using pot. This is what needs to be researched, look at Michael Phelps. Reply Pingback: Top anti-drug researcher changes his mind – says legalize marijuana | The 420 Hub Pingback: Top anti-drug researcher says legalize marijuana « daveistesting Azzy says: December 5, 2010 at 5:36 am When they put us through the mandatory DARE programs at school for six years, you could literally answer every question with: Gateway drug, destroys family, causes cancer, worse than smoking, more car crashes, ext, for everything they asked and pass. When you can fill in rhetoric like that for every answer and get a ‘diploma’ afterwards, you can safely assume the stuff they told you is absolutely false. But I was a kid, what did I know, eh? Reply Dustin says: December 22, 2010 at 2:23 pm The DARE program as it existed when I was in 5th grade was terrible, prior to the program I did not really know anything about drugs. After I “graduated” from DARE I felt like I knew a lot about drugs, in fact after discovering a stash of marijuana in my parents bedroom I thought they were hard core criminals. As a young adult, looking back the DARE program was nothing but a way to fill my head the idea that drugs would kill me or anyone else who used them. I will agree that most drugs can have negative, if not fatal consequences. However if programs like DARE presented unbiased facts maybe I would have believed them about that. They lied about pot, should I assume they lied about meth as well? Of course there is a big difference between medicating and abusing. Reply Boccelli53 says: February 4, 2011 at 5:31 am Dustin, make no mistake,chemicals will kill you.Marijuana,grown correctly,is a natural remedy for alot of things. Reply Lyn says: June 26, 2012 at 6:56 am Brainwashing, I tell ya! I went through the DARE program and at that age, I was apt to believe anything coming from a police officer. Later on, I found out most of what they told me was bull. I have two beautiful children and I wonder, is this crap DARE stuff still going on in schools? If so, I need to find a way to opt them out of the course when the time comes. I feel I, as their parent, should be the one to tell them the truth about substances, not the lies regurgitated by minds who can’t think or research for themselves. I’ve used MMJ for a decade now despite the illegal nature. It’s what makes life livable. No pain, anxiety/depression control where other meds have failed miserably and left me worse off than if I hadn’t taken them at all. But every time I have to drive into the ghetto of the major city I live near to buy my medicine, I just want to kick my governor/president in the butt. Here I am rocking my soccer mama SUV and driving into one of the worst parts of the city with a decent sum of cash in my pocket, knowing only the person I’m buying from. But, it’s my only option. Good thing I’m good friends with my dealer from way back. Otherwise, I wouldn’t feel safe enough (from arrest alone) to purchase it. I’ve been afraid they would take my kids away. The only reason pot ruins lives and families is when law intervenes and creates chaos. - Hippy Mama against prohibition Reply Kelin Kreider says: December 6, 2010 at 5:26 am The cannabis/hemp issue should not only be about medicinal-recreational use (aka smoking pot). Besides the med/rec uses of the cannabis plant, it is a valuable crop (resource) and has 1000′s of other uses which will help mankind in every way. The Re-legalization of cannabis in all it’s uses is the way to be able to do both. Millions of non-outsourced, non-government, legal, reasonably taxed, private sector JOBS worth Trillions of dollars. To list just a few and the industries that would be created: 1. Paper: cheaper to produce and more environmentally friendly- would produce many thousands of jobs in the pulp/paper industry. 2. Textiles/clothing: cheaper and less pesticides to grow than cotton and more durable fiber- anything made from cotton (jeans, shirts, shoes etc) can be made with hemp producing 1000′s of jobs. 3. Food: The hemp seed is more nutritious than soy, and is 2nd only to soy in the amount of oils produced per seed, but commercially grown, the amount of seed produced would easily outproduce soy. 1000′s of jobs. 4 Bio-fuels: Hemp can be produced into fuels like methanol for bio-diesel engines- which commercially grown can produce enough to virtually eliminate dependence on oil. Producing many 1000′s of jobs. 5. Construction: The hemp fiber can replace many types of wood/tree products (plywood, chipboard, even a hempcrete) needed for construction of houses. Many 1000′s of jobs. 6. Farming: All of this hemp needs to be grown, mass produced by American farmers. Acre upon acre, mile after mile, state by state, producing many, Many, MANY 1000′s of jobs. All would be legal, regulated, moderately taxed, like every other job in America producing millions of jobs worth Trillions of dollars. Not one joint or bit of THC/CBD is produced out of any of it- no one can get high or get medicine from growing hemp for industrial use. I have still not even mentioned the industry and jobs that would be created for the medicinal/ recreational industry. Which would, once decriminalized, account for the least amount of jobs and taxes from hemp/cannabis decriminalization, although it would also be worth several billion dollars and produce around as many jobs as the alcohol/tobacco industries only better. Commercial growers could produce average B-flat grades of cannabis (Budmeiser perhaps). Micro-groweries could grow the more rare, exotic, and potent, top-shelf quality varieties. Adults could grow their own medicine without the fear of having your door kicked in by Law Enforcement. Because being no longer a crime, YOU, are no longer a criminal. This beneficial plant is a safe medicine and recreation when used responsibly by adults. We should not go to jail or be fined for cannabis/hemp. No more than for any legal, regulated product, medicine, or resource. Time to Re-Think, Re-Educate, and Re-legalize Hemp. Lets end the War on Cannabis. For jobs, for medicine, for the economy, for the country and the world. Reply Boccelli53 says: February 4, 2011 at 5:39 am The United States could be so far ahead of the game with this. The benefits could be world-wide. Reply Leonard Krivitsky, MD says: February 3, 2011 at 7:02 pm The US Government should overcome its own “denial” with respect to Medicinal Cannabis, which can serve as a safe alternativ­e to many pharmaceut­ical chemicals on the market. I believe it is very positive that the President acknowledg­­es the “validity” of this debate. Whenever the validity of the debate is recognized­­, such a “recogniti­­on” invariably implies that our side has a “valid argument”; this being so, it follows that our side (in favor of Cannabis/M­edicinal Cannabis Legalizati­on) has a very real possibilit­­y of winning this “perfectly legitimate debate”, for otherwise it would not be a “debate”. For example, to even suggest that Cannabis Plant has no medicinal properties is not even a “logical” thing to do; as a “recreatio­­nal” substance, Cannabis is incomparab­­ly safer than alcohol! And if all this were not enough, it is scientific­­ally proven that Cannabis use (as opposed to alcohol use) suppresses violent urges and behaviors. All this is true even if the President is “personall­­y opposed” to legalizati­­on (at least for now). But we cannot sit on our butts and passively expect positive developmen­­ts to occur. We must participat­­e actively, write comments at the news articles, write to politician­­s, sign petitions, register to vote, etc. I specifical­­ly urge all the young people to talk to their parents and grandparen­­ts and educate them about Cannabis vs. alcohol and hard drugs. As the logical evidence in our favor inexorably accumulate­­s, the “qualitati­­ve shift” will occur in our common consciousn­­ess, and we will win this “perfectly legitimate­­” debate! Reply Coinspinner says: February 3, 2011 at 10:06 pm He’s dishonest, this research turned up in 1974. Or rather he got honest very very late. Let me guess, he’s retired and off the NIDA teet. Reply corey freund says: February 4, 2011 at 12:19 am Thank you mr.tashkin. your support will assist us greatly, a man of your caliber, proof positive stating what we have been for years. The evidence supporting the repeal of the prohibitian of cannabis is stacking up aganst the lies, spewing out of those who want no change.. the day is comming, and until than we must keep fighting! Reply Boccelli53 says: February 4, 2011 at 5:48 am Governmental red-tape can be a bitch on any issue. I hope to see this happen in my lifetime. A good start would be de-criminalization. Reply Karen says: March 4, 2011 at 2:09 am I have chronic, end-stage Lyme disease and a co-infection of babesia, which is similar to malaria. I had them licked, but as is in most cases, they both came back. I had them for decades before I was diagnosed. My heart is affected, and I have fibromyalgia and arthritis in every joint to the point where I cannot walk. I tried smokin weed once at a friend’s house, and I was still when I stood up, but felt no pain. I feel marijuana must be legalized for those of us in chronic pain so we can walk and tolerate our normal daily lives. I want to be a young, cool, fun, hip grandmother. Not one riddled with pain in a nursing home. I feel this is the time and it must be legalized. What can I do to help the process? I am just a well-educated doctor’s wife, a housewife, mother and grandmother who wants out of pain and misery. I want to make a change in the world. What can I do? Reply editors says: March 4, 2011 at 7:41 pm Dear Karen, i would suggest getting on Facebook, and then contacting https://www.facebook.com/MarkDPedersen?ref=ts He is working hard, relentlessly, trying to get medical marijuana legalized. Ask him what you can do. At the very least, he is full of information as to how far along we are toward legal medicine, and is extremely encouraging. He used to be a priest, and now his ministry is in helping people just like you (and me). God Bless. Reply Pingback: Top anti-drug researcher changes his mind – says legalize marijuana (via Patients for Medical Cannabis) « superjens "Crazy" Alishia Mason says: April 15, 2011 at 7:14 pm PTSD SUCKS; BUT YOU KNOW WHAT SUCKS MORE~SEEING SOMEONE GOING THROUGH IT!! COUNTLESS TIMES I HAVE SEEN COMBAT VETERANS (ME TOO) GET TOO DRUNK (ALCOHOL BAD;WEED GOOD) AND ACT OUT INTO SOCIETY SAYING THINGS ABOUT THE WAR OR JUST GOING OFF THE DEEP END… I AM FOREVER INDEBTED TO “ALL” THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA, MY COUNTRY, SO I BEG YOU TO HELP US-WE ARE SUFFERING AND THE MEDS EITHER DON’T WORK OR MAKE US SLEEP ALL DAY!! I WOULD RATHER SMOKE A SPLIFF THAN TAKE TWENTY DIFFERENT PILLS EVERY SINGLE DAY…. FOR THE SAKE OF THE NATION… PLEASE~DO NOT FORGET ABOUT ALL THOSE SUFFERING FROM OTHER SEVERE ILLNESSES TO INCLUDE MS AND CANCER.. BESIDES IMAGINE ALL THE MONEY YOU WILL MAKE IN TAXES AND THE AMERICAN PUBLIC (AT LEAST ME) WOULD RATHER BUY IT FROM A DOCTOR THAN A “DRUG DEALER”…. Reply Pingback: Top Anti-Drug Researcher Changes His Mind Pingback: Top 10 Pro-Marijuana Articles « Cafe Vale Tudo Pingback: Canadian Pharmacy Disclosure – More Die of Lung Cancer than … | Cancer-healthylifestylereview.info stuverod says: February 20, 2012 at 8:18 am Cannabis is the best medicine no bad side effect Reply Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Monday, September 24, 2012

Delegates oppose giving pharmacists authority to prescribe drugs

PROFESSION Delegates oppose giving pharmacists authority to prescribe drugs The AMA voices concern that an Food and Drug Administration proposal could expand such rights. By Alicia Gallegos, amednews staff. Posted July 2, 2012. PRINT| E-MAIL| RESPOND| REPRINTS| SHARE Annual Meeting 2012 RESOURCES Slideshow Our coverage of the meeting Central meeting archive AMA official proceedings Chicago The American Medical Association House of Delegates adopted policy that opposes federal and state legislation that allows pharmacists to prescribe medication absent supervision or a valid order by a doctor. The policy, adopted at the AMA Annual Meeting, also opposes legislation that lets pharmacists dispense medication beyond the expiration of the original prescription. The move stems from a public meeting in March at which the Food and Drug Administration sought feedback from health and physician organizations about expanding the range of over-the-counter drugs. Under the new paradigm, the agency would allow some drugs for chronic conditions, such as asthma and allergies, to be sold from the pharmacy counter without a prescription. The model would allow pharmacists to determine patients’ needs for certain medications and help verify their self-diagnoses. The FDA has said the change would eliminate unnecessary doctor visits and connect more patients to needed medications. But delegates are concerned that the model broadens pharmacists’ authority to dispense drugs and compromises patient safety. “Should the FDA move forward, it will likely have a sea of impact on the physician community,” said Joseph Sokolowski Jr., MD, a pulmonologist in Medford Lakes, N.J., and a delegate with the American Thoracic Society. The AMA should “closely monitor the FDA and seek broad approval for any [FDA] proposals and study the cost to consumers,” he said. Some delegates disagreed with formulating a stance on the FDA’s plan until the house looks more into the issue. But most expressed support for taking a position while the plan is being developed. “This is clearly a scope issue,” said Vicksburg, Miss.-based family physician Randy Easterling, MD, an alternate delegate for the Mississippi State Medical Assn. who spoke on his own behalf. “If we don’t speak out against it, in five years we’ll be dealing with” the consequences. Back to top -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Meeting notes: Legislative action Issue: The health system reform law created a basic health program as an option for providing health care to low-income individuals in lieu of exchanges and other state health plans. Proposed action: Establish principles for state basic health programs, including adequate physician and health professional networks, negotiated payment rates, and state medical society involvement in legislative and regulatory processes. [Adopted] Issue: Pregnant women and postpartum mothers lack insurance coverage for mental health services. Proposed action: Support improvements to mental health services for women who are pregnant or postpartum, and advocate for inclusive coverage of such services during gestation and up to one year postpartum. [Adopted] Issue: Budget cuts have led states to eliminate or reduce coverage for mental health services. Proposed action: Support maintaining essential mental health services, including inpatient and outpatient mental hospitals, community mental health centers, addiction treatment centers and other state-supported psychiatric services. Also support enforcement of the Mental Health Parity Act and state mobile crisis teams to treat the homeless. [Adopted] Issue: Medical clinics sponsored by employers offer access to preventive and other health services to employees at the workplace. Proposed action: Study employer-sponsored clinic benefits and develop guidelines on patient privacy, safety and access, and the staffing of clinics by physicians or supervised practitioners. [Adopted] Issue: Pursuing solely punitive penal action in drug offender cases may not be the most beneficial for drug abusers and the community. Drug courts, which focus on intensive treatment and supervision of drug offenders, are being used in some parts of the country. Proposed action: The American Medical Association should support the establishment of drug courts as an effective method of intervention for individuals with addictive disease who are convicted of nonviolent crimes. [Adopted] Issue: Physicians are concerned that the Physician Payments Sunshine Act will be burdensome and lead to overregulation by the government. The measure, approved as part of the Affordable Care Act, requires the reporting of gifts and payments to physicians from drug and device manufacturers. The data collection will start in 2013. Proposed action: The AMA should continue its efforts to minimize the burden and unauthorized expansion of the Sunshine Act by the Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services. The Association also should recommend to CMS that a physician comment section be included on the “Physician Payments Sunshine Act” public database. [Adopted] Issue: The switch from ICD-9 to ICD-10 diagnosis code sets for billing physician services will create unnecessary and significant financial and workflow disruptions for doctors. ICD-11 is on the horizon and may be a less-burdensome transition for physicians if they wait and move from ICD-9 to ICD-11 at a later date. Proposed action: The AMA should evaluate the feasibility of moving from ICD-9 to ICD-11 as an alternative to ICD-10 and report back to the House of Delegates. [Adopted] Back to top -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright 2012 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. RELATED CONTENT » FDA weighs prescriptions without medical visits May 14 » Psychologists seek prescribing rights in 6 states March 7, 2011 » Louisiana psychologists can prescribe meds June 7, 2004 » Drug reps targeting nonphysicians March 27, 2000